
Since the start of last season, the New Jersey Devils have been playing in the glittering Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey. But now that the rent on that publicly-funded palace has come due, the Devils are looking for a way out. Here's Maura McDermott from the Star-Ledger:
The Devils do not plan to pay the first year's rent on the $375 million Prudential Center and instead say the Newark Housing Authority owes them nearly $800,000 due to delays in completing the arena.I think we should all personally thank Devils owner Jeff Vanderbeek for providing an object lesson in why governments should think twice, and maybe even a third time, before agreeing to publicly finance sports arenas.The authority, which owns the arena, gave the team until last Monday to make what was expected to be a multimillion-dollar rent payment, granting the team's requests for two extensions on the Sept. 30 deadline.
On Tuesday, team owners delivered 12 pages of letters and calculations to the authority stating their lease allowed them to deduct nearly $2.9 million from the roughly $2.1 million rent owed and take a $210,000 credit for next year's rent, due to delays in building the year-old arena and completing construction on surrounding land.
As a result, the authority owes the team $791,530, according to a letter from Gordon Lavalette, an executive vice president with the team.
First off, folks should know that the Devils aren't the first team to pull this trick. Here in Washington, the Nationals held back rent from the city and used exactly the same reasoning to justify it.
But here's the real kicker: we're heading into a recession -- an economic contraction. When the economy contracts, salaries contract. When salaries contract, tax revenue contracts -- and urban governments like Newark are looking at a long stretch where they're going to have to make some hard financial choices. And in the midst of all this, the Devils are going to be withholding a couple of millions of dollars from the city that I'm betting their accountants expected to receive.
And when Newark doesn't get that money, it means somehow, somewhere, some vital city service is going to get cut.
The only other option that might be available would be for the state to bail out the city. In other words, all taxpayers statewide are going to have to pony up the dollars that the Devils ought to be paying.
One final question to ponder: we need to consider the real possibility that the Devils are going down this road not to simply enforce the contract to the last letter, but rather as a rational response to help conserve cash in anticipation of a wider economic downturn.
I watched the Devils-Maple Leafs game last night, and while the attendance was pegged at just above 14,000, I counted a lot of empty seats.
















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-30-2008 @ 4:28PM
Vincent Diggins said...
The city should board the building up and tell the devils to go back to hell.
Reply
10-30-2008 @ 6:08PM
mark said...
you really don't make any sense. You know how many people does the Devils employ from the Newark area and surroundings. These credits are there business to create jobs which funnel back income taxes to the city for a start. You don't just look at today's rent. You look at the discounted cash flow from operating that arena over the next decade or so. I can assure you and everyone, that Newark will benefit a lot from having the Devils, both financially and in a creating an intangible goodwill for Newark which should attract further investments.
I don't know which objective do you serve from spreading these lies through capitalizing on the poor's people feelings.
Reply
10-31-2008 @ 5:13PM
Lloyd the Barber said...
What kind of jobs do arenas create? Low paying, benefit-free service jobs. The team/building contract out to a third party (usually aramark) who usually hires non-union, transient workers.
A study published in this book show incomes actually decrease in areas surrounding publicly funded stadiums.
As Erik said, if stadia were good investments, wouldn't big smart businessmen be lining up to throw money at them?
10-30-2008 @ 6:16PM
Eric McErlain said...
@Mark
With all due respect ...
http://news.illinois.edu/news/04/1117stadiums.html
If sports arenas are such a good investment, then why not finance them 100% with private dollars?
Granted, I'm not against cities making "infrastructure improvements" in tandem with the building of a privately financed arena -- much like it happened here in Washington with the Verizon Center. But cities need to know that the rosy financial projections that often come with stadium construction proposals are exactly that -- rosy. And in an urban center like Newark, a place where the budget is overstretched and vital needs go unmet everyday, losing not getting your hands on $2.1 million in rent is a big deal.
Reply
10-31-2008 @ 11:21AM
Ian said...
Why doesn't the arena just lock them out? The arena is the one holding all the cards here, and has all the bargaining power. The Devils have nothing.
We had a minor league hockey team in Orlando, FL who were locked out of two arenas due to failing to pay rent. They originally played in the Amway Arena in downtown Orlando, but were locked out. Then they moved to Kissimmee and played in the Silver Spurs Arena and again failed to pay rent, and again, got locked out (midseason). Finally the team was just disbanded, and ticket holders got screwed.
Reply