
The drama never stops for the Anaheim Ducks. Even a simple five-day break in the schedule cannot pass without some major news, in this case the stepping down of general manager Brian Burke, who of course had architected Anaheim's 2007 Stanley Cup Champion roster. Burke is probably off to work for the Toronto Maple Leafs, and in his stead right-hand man Bob Murray has assumed the GM duties for the Ducks. This was to be the final year of Brian Burke's contract, so the timing of the departure makes some sense, though it definitely caught this Ducks fan off-guard.
Over at Battle of California, I have begun a series of posts entitled "Burke Week", where I take a look back at the Anaheim legacy of Brian Burke. So far I have talked about three things that I think Burke gets too much criticism for, plus three things that I don't think he gets criticized enough for. Later on in the week I'll look at some of the positive lessons we can learn from Burke the general manager, as well as some downsides to having such a brash and outspoken executive in Anaheim's front office. In addition, I was also a guest on The Rink Podcast this week to talk over some of the ramifications of Burke's departure.
Overall, I can't get too upset with the notion of Burke leaving, though as the cartoon suggests there is some feeling of being jilted. At the very least Burke has left next year's roster in very manageable shape -- lots of contracts expire at the end of the year, so Bob Murray does have freedom to mold next year's roster to his own liking. We shall see how the Ducks evolve over the coming year, but no matter how that turns out, I feel confident that the Toronto media has finally found the right
















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-20-2008 @ 1:37PM
Julian said...
Architected? Really?
Don't you feel like we should get something for other teams being able to negotiate with Burke while he's under contract to us? It feels a little like the Bryzgalov situation.
Reply
11-20-2008 @ 1:41PM
Earl Sleek said...
I'm comfortable enough with the term "architected".
The Ducks did go to Cup Finals three seasons apart (four years, with the lockout), and those teams really only had three players in common -- Giguere, Pahlsson, and Rob Niedermayer. With that much turnover, there was definitely a re-make, and one guy was calling those shots.
As for the tampering notion, I don't think it's that terrible, but I guess I'm not a legalist. I am a little curious about the talk about Toronto hiring Dave Nonis, though. I didn't know he was given permission to talk to other teams while he's a Ducks consultant.
Reply
11-20-2008 @ 4:42PM
Leaf Fan said...
As a leaf fan, I'm just praying he accepts our multi million dollar offer...we need a cup...It is absolutely embarassing that the Anaheim Ducks, yes, the Ducks, won a stanley cup, and we haven't won one in over 40 years...what a joke.
Reply
11-20-2008 @ 4:53PM
Earl Sleek said...
I guess I'll apologize that the Anaheim Ducks were the last straw in your original-six-style frustration.
I think the Burke-to-the-Leafs thing is pretty much a lock; whether it leads to a Stanley Cup remains to be seen. Still, there's definitely a lot worse than Burke -- at the very least, you'll have a controversial quote to laugh at every few days or so.
Reply