Each Friday throughout the season, I'll provide you with my predictions on whose stock is on the rise and whose is failing miserably like an American bank. It's a neat little segment entitled Buys and Sells. There are a few teams/players/issues to buy and a few to sell. Glad to see you back here today. I hope that you had a good Thanksgiving and are one of the lucky folks who has today off. Today there's only one topic, but trust me, we'll make it worth the read. I'm starting to feel like Andy Rooney. The crazy guy at the end of the show, except in this case it's the end of the week. That's OK, I'm pretty sure what I'm saying is fairly coherent, which I can't always say about Andy. Anyway, on to the Buys and Sells!
Sell: Black Third Jerseys. Now, until recently, I didn't have any problem with NHL teams wearing black jerseys. In fact they looked pretty bad ass for the most part. But now that almost everyone has simply pulled a cop-out when it comes to their third jersey, it's not something I can get behind. Seriously, what's so special about a third jersey if they're all going to look the same? Well, maybe they're special, but the creativity that we've seen out of so many NHL marketing departments over the years has been completely thrown out the window. It's almost like, when designing their new jerseys, some of them got together and had a 10-second long meeting.
"We need a third jersey, what are our options?"
"How about a black version of our home jersey?"
"Brilliant! Get it done!"
By my count, with a little help from the fine folks at Icethetics, six teams have already implemented black third jerseys and the Kings are expected to be the seventh soon. And the worst part? Almost all of them show little, if any, creativity. Isn't that what the third jersey is all about? It's supposed to be something different and new that inspires -- let's be honest here -- jersey sales.
Take a look at the six teams that have already released black third jerseys:
- Boston Bruins
- Phoenix Coyotes
- Ottawa Senators
- Carolina Hurricanes
- Chicago Blackhawks
- San Jose Sharks
But in San Jose, which has been in existence for barely two decades, isn't not nearly as excusable. Teal stripes, their current logo and, as the Rolling Stones would say, paint it black. Seriously. That's it. One last question before I get off my soapbox -- were the Bruins even trying?
















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-28-2008 @ 1:06PM
Mike said...
To your point, yes, a handful are black and while most jerseys are fairly unoriginal these days -- the majority of Third Jerseys are not black. Take a look: http://shop.nhl.com/family/index.jsp?&categoryId=3348543&view=all
Reply
11-28-2008 @ 5:54PM
zorkon said...
To be fair, the boston jersey ALREADY WAS black, so if the third is a version of that, that's not a problem.
Which, of course, has nothing to do with the fact that it's the home jersey with the shoulder and front logos switched around.
My belief that they will never change the jersey meaningfully (they [familyfriendlysite] around with the logo a little bit and the shoulders change, but it's basically the same) stays unshaken, mostly.
Reply
11-28-2008 @ 8:48PM
Tony said...
San Jose has a new logo its the full body of the shark and what color would you want these jerseys to be?
Reply
11-29-2008 @ 11:32AM
gmuny2002 said...
You can thank the old Vancouver Canucks of the 1980's for that! Supposedly, they did a study that iterated that black is the most intimadating color, then they came up with those god-awful sweaters with the "vee" on the front!
Reply
11-30-2008 @ 11:38PM
Alex said...
To be fair to the Sharks and Blackhawks, they've had black third jerseys for as long as I can remember. The B's had a strong 3rd jersey with the bear on the gold in the late 90's; it's too bad they didn't go back to it.
The Yotes look awful in their third jersey.
Reply