I know what many of you are going to say.
Hockey is a contact sport. You can't stop the physicality, because it's such a huge part of the game.
I want no part of stopping the clean hitting that goes on in hockey. I have no problem with fighting, as long as we don't start dropping gloves just for the fun of it.
What I have a problem with are blatant, unnecessary hits from behind. As an example, here's Willie Mitchell of Vancouver blasting Edmonton's Tom Gilbert Wednesday night.
Discussion after the jump.
Gilbert told Rogers SportsNet that he put himself "in a vulnerable position". I don't disagree. However, the job of discretion in a situation like this belongs to Mitchell. The guy he's hitting has his back turned to Mitchell the whole time. At some point, these hits have to be more carefully legislated.
I'd vote for "three years ago" as a good time to start, but I don't get a vote.
In college hockey, Mitchell would have received a five-minute major for a hit from behind, along with an automatic game misconduct. That's a rule that was put in place after North Dakota's Robbie Bina suffered a broken neck after a hit from behind in the 2005 WCHA Final Five. Bina missed a season, but did finish his college career and is now playing minor-league hockey.
"But this isn't college hockey, Bruce!"
No, it's not. But that doesn't mean player safety shouldn't be significant. Again, I'm not trying to ban hitting. I do, however, want players to be smarter about who they hit and how they hit them. The big hits can be clean, can still wow a crowd, and can still make the highlight reels.
Mitchell's hit, the two others I saw in that game that were somewhat similar (I'm not trying to pick on Mitchell here), and the literally dozens of similar hits that happen in NHL arenas over the course of a couple weeks need to be stopped.
There should be a rule in place that mandates a five-minute major for any hit from behind that sends a player into the boards. It doesn't matter if it's a cross-check, a straight hit from behind, an elbow, or whatever. I'm not sure this will solve all the issues, but it will make the players think twice before they try to throw the big hit along the boards.
















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-08-2009 @ 12:19PM
Rhinosaur said...
Looked good to me.
Reply
1-08-2009 @ 12:53PM
Derek said...
Couldn't disagree more..Gilbert tries to get out of the way and it ends up being a hip to hip check into the boards..the ones that should be looked at are the hits from behind that send a player head first into the boards..that is not the case in this check..clean in my book
Reply
1-08-2009 @ 1:01PM
Odie said...
Agree with the article, and people like Rhino here are meatheads.
I don't want to take the checking out of hockey but that hit clearly is checking from behind, which is a penalty.
Just like in the NFL, when you can clearly see both numbers on the back of the jersey, you can't hit them.
The hockey rulebook is very vague with lots of room for interpretation, but that penalty was clear.
What I don't like is that they leave the onus on the player making the check to pull up when a player is in a vulnerable position near the boards. I wouldn't call this a cheap shot, there was no way to know where Gilbert was going to turn, so expecting Mitchell to pull up is impossible, but inadvertent or not, still a penalty.
Reply
1-08-2009 @ 1:56PM
Tristen said...
That was a clean hit, It was not from behind. It was shoulder to shoulder. It came from the side.
Reply
1-09-2009 @ 1:45AM
Hugh G Rection said...
completely clean hit. In the nfl, if you see a hit coming and you turn your back, it's not a penalty.
Reply