Hurricanes 4, Devils 3: Recap | Box Score | Tuesday's Scores
Other Coverage:
Wings Spoil Columbus' Home Playoff Debut
Fleury Carries Penguins to Win
Canucks Finish Sweep of Blues
Other Coverage:
Wings Spoil Columbus' Home Playoff Debut
Fleury Carries Penguins to Win
Canucks Finish Sweep of Blues
The controversy comes in contact made between goal scorer Jussi Jokinen and Devils goalie Martin Brodeur (35 seconds into the above video). Replays shown after the play seemed to indicate that Brodeur left the crease intentionally, and after doing so, he bumped into Jokinen.
While the argument could be made that Jokinen knew exactly where Brodeur was, the officials on the ice ruled the contact was incidental. According to NHL.com's highly informative Situation Room Blog, the interference was not reviewed by the replay crew.
Play was reviewed to determine if the shot by Carolina's Jokinen crossed the line before time expired in the third period... the review determined that the puck crossed the line with 00.2 seconds left - good goal for Carolina.In addition, the league also issued a statement through that blog about the goalie interference ruling.
The NHL's goalie interference rule sets a mandate to protect the goalie in the blue ice – to let the goalie do his job. In the white ice, it is a more delicate matter, including who moved into whom. The referee has one split-second look at it and it is a judgment call. The Situation Room has no video review capacity in this instance. That said, the Situation Room officials agreed with the call on the ice, that it looked like the goalie, Martin Brodeur, moved out toward the skater.Here's a look at NHL Rule 69.1, which governs goaltender interference.
Goals should be disallowed only if: (1) an attacking player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper's ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal; or (2) an attacking player initiates intentional or deliberatecontact with a goalkeeper, inside or outside of his goal crease. Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact. The rule will be enforced exclusively in accordance with the on-ice judgement of the Referee(s), and not by means of video replay or review.Honestly, I'm not sure this is so cut-and-dried. While it's obvious to me that Brodeur left his crease on his own, it was also kind of clear that Jokinen knew where Brodeur was and made no effort to avoid him. Everyone knows Brodeur likes to hang out on the edge of that blue paint.
The key words to focus on are "provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact". Jokinen made no effort to avoid the contact.
That said, is it fair to charge Jokinen with goalie interference when he had his back to Brodeur the whole time and was clearly well outside the crease?
Absolutely not. You can't avoid contact that you don't see coming.
The officials on the ice got the call right. It would have been difficult to argue against the call had it gone the other way, because it does look like Jokinen is fine making contact with the goalie in that situation. Even outside of the blue paint, such contact is not allowed.
Brodeur can complain all he wants (and he did throw a tantrum that would have embarrassed me had it been thrown by my seven-year-old son), but the series is tied at two wins apiece. The critical Game Five will be played Thursday night in Newark.
















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-21-2009 @ 10:58PM
mastanameless16 said...
Stay in your crease and shut up Fatso!! lol
Reply
4-21-2009 @ 11:14PM
Dr Huxtable said...
agreed
4-22-2009 @ 3:26AM
randallp51r said...
Take it like a man Marty. You have much more experince than to throw your stick and act like that. Get your head screwed on.
Reply
4-22-2009 @ 7:36AM
steve said...
I love how the announcer says he wasn't outside the crease right as they show him outside the crease when he got bumped.
Reply
4-22-2009 @ 8:17AM
s12ki said...
If you lookat the video the Canes player checks where Brodeur is so he can get in front and screen him because at the point he looks brodeur is in the crease. Brodeur moves out of the crease and turns into the Canes players path hoping to go into OT with a power play for Goaltender Interference but it bit him in the ass so he cries foul because the goal went in. If there was a penalty then there would have been no goal and he should have complained harder right away to make his case look good and not have a hissy fit after the goal is counted. Just plain bad acting by Marty
Reply
4-22-2009 @ 9:46AM
jim said...
You ****oles realize the rule is you cannot bump the goalie outside of the crease unless you have the puck --- he was clearly bumped and that easliy could have bee the difference of him getting in position---
Reply
4-22-2009 @ 12:39PM
Niv said...
Actually you are wrong Jim, incidental contact is allowed with a goalie when he's out of the blue ice. Brodeur moved into the skater more than the skater moving into Brodeur, it was a good goal that's the way it goes man.
By the way in case you think I'm a Canes fan, I don't give a shit about them, this simply was a legal goal.
Go Canucks Go!
4-22-2009 @ 1:31PM
jim said...
how exactly is that incidental contact -- when he is no where near the play or puck --- I know you are allowed incidental contact -- but anybody saying that that is clearly a legal goal is basing it on an opinion--- and most people think that because he was out of the crease that he is fair game
Reply
4-22-2009 @ 3:58PM
s12ki said...
Watch the Video again the Canes player looks where Brodeur is and skates backwards in a straight line not towards Bodeur. Brodeur comes out looking to get a call to have a power play in overtime. Ibe more upset with the third Canes goal where he is in the crease and the Canes player is in the crease an ran into him. I am a ref and not a fan of either team and feel you should not be in the crease when a goal is scored. 4th goal was Brodeurs fault he moved outside the crease into the backwards path of the Caanes player. 3rd goal would upset me more.
4-22-2009 @ 2:57PM
Dino said...
what a puszee..... Brodeur thats why no one cared that you have the most wins by a goaltender.
Reply
4-22-2009 @ 4:39PM
Mike said...
once a goalie comes out of the crease, they should be fair game just like everyone else, heck they have 40 pounds of pads on to protect themselves. this is just broduer crying again.
Reply
4-22-2009 @ 10:05PM
jeff santos said...
NHL RULE 69.1 is very clear but martin broduer was clearly out of the crease as the replay shows canes end of story
Reply
4-22-2009 @ 5:07PM
dalkow8 said...
Mike, while I agree Goalies get away with murder out of their creases, the rule is the rule. Tough call to lose a game, but clearly Marty came out in full knowledge of where Jussi was and in my opinion initiated contact thusly: good goal. I'm all about goal tending and particularly puck handling goalies like the Martys (Broduer and Turco) but it can hurt you too. Marty stays in the crease, comes across cleanly and this game is in to OT.
Reply
4-22-2009 @ 5:19PM
Aaron said...
I'm a big Cane's fan! But to not show any favoritism, I would honestly say that the referee's made a good call, and maybe Marty wanted to draw a penalty on Carolina so they can go into OT. I've seen Carolina do the same thing in the 2006 Stanley Cup Playoffs, when they scored with 2 tenths of a second to go in the 3rd. That very same year they went on to win the Cup. GO CANE'S GO!!!
Reply
4-22-2009 @ 8:06PM
duckinnut said...
I'm a BRUINS fan and this is a non biased opinion.Thats a goal,sorry.Marty boy caused the contact the Carolina player had jis back to him and Broduer skated into him. I hate Carolina/Hartford.
Reply
4-22-2009 @ 11:01PM
devilfan918 said...
you people are all fucking morons, YOU CANT HIT THE GOALIE, and brodeur isn't a player who would try to get an interference call on purpose. hes not a complainer either thereofre he must have really been wrongd if he threw his stick like that, he doesn't do that otherwise.
Reply
4-23-2009 @ 8:15AM
s12ki said...
You think he was not thinking that you are nuts. any smart or good goalie would try you have unbiased opinions looking at this. Stop being a homer and watch the video Marty moved in the Canes lane The Canes player did not go at Brodeur to hit him Marty moved in his way. DUMBASS
4-22-2009 @ 11:38PM
ljbdavis said...
devilfan918: Marty did the hockey equivalent of trying to draw a charge in basketball. He came out of his nice, safe, protected crease where no contact is allowed and initiated contact with the 'Cane. The refs didn't bite. Game over. 'Canes win. Deal with it.
Reply