
Without actually facing elimination, the Pittsburgh Penguins couldn't have faced a bigger must-win than they did Tuesday night. While Detroit hasn't truly dominated the Penguins in the opening two games of the Stanley Cup finals, they have played well enough to win both. Since there isn't much in hockey that's more dangerous than a hot Detroit team, the Penguins had to find a way to cool them off before things got out of hand.
Pittsburgh was able to start fast, as so many teams do when playing their first home game of a series. Thanks to a Maxime Talbot one-timer, the Penguins enjoyed an early lead. Detroit struck quickly, but their 2-1 lead was also short-lived. A goal by Kris Letang late in the first period tied the score.
The Penguins rode the goaltending of Marc-Andre Fleury through the second period. It may have actually been Detroit's best period of the series. They asserted their puck-control game, bottled up Pittsburgh's defensemen for numerous long shifts, and outshot the Pens 14-4 in the second.
Fleury kept the game tied. When he was beaten, a wicked wrist shot by Mikael Samuelsson found metal, not twine.
In the third, it was clear Pittsburgh wanted to take advantage of their younger legs, energetic home crowd, and superb speed and skill. A fast start yielded nothing against Chris Osgood, but the persistent Eastern Conference champions took advantage of a potentially controversial power play.
Detroit defenseman Jonathan Ericsson was called for a rather dubious holding penalty along the right-wing boards. On the ensuing man advantage, Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin were all over the place, finally able to combine on the setup for a Sergei Gonchar bomb from the center blue line. It was a shot that Osgood never really got a look at, as he had Penguins veteran Bill Guerin standing in front of him.
Pittsburgh actually had the better of the chances after this goal. Crosby and Chris Kunitz got loose for a two-on-one, with Crosby's pass perhaps leading Kunitz a bit too close to the net for him to get a good shot. Talbot dinged the post with a couple minutes to go, then netted his second of the night after Osgood had gone to the bench for an extra skater.
While the Red Wings were definitely the better team in the second period, Pittsburgh looked like the better team -- at both ends of the rink -- in the third. It was a stark contrast to the first two games, where Detroit played from ahead in the final 20 minutes and simply suffocated Pittsburgh.
Fleury was outstanding in goal when he had to be, and credit must also be given to Malkin. You could easily argue he shouldn't have been eligible to play in this game, but he was, and he was a huge factor. He picked up three assists and gave great effort without the puck, picking up a huge block of a Nicklas Lidstrom shot in the closing minutes while it was still a one-goal game.
Detroit still has a 2-1 lead in the best-of-seven series. Game 4 is Thursday night in Pittsburgh.
















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
6-02-2009 @ 11:05PM
Crayfish said...
A good game. Both teams played well. Glad the Pens won, we will have more hockey to watch!
Reply
6-02-2009 @ 11:19PM
Josh said...
I have to admit, the Pens deserved that win. They worked their asses off. As a Wings fan, I would have liked to see a few more penalties called but oh well. After the first two games... I didn't expect much in that department.
The one thing I did notice, however, is that even when losing the Wings are better than the Penguins. Game 1 loss, Crosby sticks his stick out as Maltby is going to congratulate Ozzy. GAme 2 loss, Malkin fights Zetterberg. Game 3 loss, the Wings skate off to the locker room without doing anything.
Reply
6-02-2009 @ 11:58PM
kintokin66 said...
Simple facts:
The Wings didn't look as sharp as they usually do. They couldn't sustain any quality pressure on offense and were not passing very crisply. Not their ususal tape to tape passes.
The officiating sucked again but we all expected it would. That's the only thing consistent when it comes to the refs.
The convenient non call on the too many men on the ice penalty for over 20 seconds. I mean come on now and this is the cup finals!
The numerous non calls like when Franzen was punched in the side of the head, or the too many to count boarding and interference infractions.Then the pitiful call on Erikson to allow the go ahead goal. It's clear who they want to win and it's a shame the league, the owners, players and yes us the fans let them get away with it year after year.
The Wings will still win this series because they are simply a better team. The Pens will soon win a cup but not this year. GO WINGS!!!
Reply
6-03-2009 @ 12:09AM
Aaron said...
How many refs does it take to call a to many men on the ice, the country is in a recession and we have to many people out of work that can count to 7. Then to let them have the man on the ice for 21 seconds inside the Detroit blue line. What a embarassment to the NHL to no they have illiterate officals on the ice all (4) of them missed the play, I hope these clowns never see the ice again, they should be banned from officiating any NHL games.
Reply
6-03-2009 @ 1:21AM
cjgdnight said...
WHAAAA... WHAAAA... how about when Wings broke PENS defensman's stick in game two and go on to score power play goal... the announcers are constantly talking about the wings obstruction and interference... hey the wings are veteran players.. they know how to do it and not get called... but it is still a penalty... stop whining!!!
BTW is to "know" they have illiterate officials.. not "no"... mr dictionary don't fail me now!
Reply
6-03-2009 @ 2:46AM
baczik said...
If you watch the"broken stick" play that you're fefering to, (it's on You tube) you can clearly see the Penguins player broke his own stick slashing the Red Wing play;er. You're right, it was a NON-CALL..and as usual, in favor of the Pens. Look for yourself, if you dare to.
6-03-2009 @ 8:23AM
jeff2005alldone said...
dude just because the announcers said the wing was the one who broke his stick, doesnt mean thats what happended look again on the replay and youll see it wasnt from a red wing hitting his stick , if u know anything about hockey u know sticks do break. its a crooked series and just sit back and see who the nhl wants to win, for me i just tape the games and after reading all the press from this game and from comments like this ill just delete the game from my box and hope for the best in game 4. as for the nhl and your refs shame on u , most hockey fans can see right through your garbage.
6-03-2009 @ 10:26AM
Aaron said...
Get your facts straight it was not a power play goal, time had expired on the power play dah!
6-03-2009 @ 1:50AM
bzsurf7 said...
the interfernce call was correct. The wings dominated the game and the Pens won...you have to look at the scoring chances though. this was the best the Pens can play. Wings in 5 and they dont even have Datsyuk!
Reply
6-03-2009 @ 3:24AM
gsweetgreen0622 said...
I love the wings.If you want to get to know them better ,search their names on "www.richcupids.com". it's crazy!
Reply
6-03-2009 @ 6:23AM
thetrutheh said...
the pens won, wing fans won't whine, we leave that up to the pens and their fans. we do miss datsyuk and drapes but apparently will have to win without either. the wings had their chances but did not capitalize on them. we do have to laugh at the pen fans, their team wins, yet they continue to whine. go figure and go wings.........
Reply
6-03-2009 @ 8:26AM
Joe said...
so I guess Aaron must not be a Wing fan then? Cause his post sure looked like whining to me.
6-03-2009 @ 11:47AM
Aaron said...
Hey Joe yes I was whinning, and all I can say is it takes one to know one and you know them all in Pitsburgh.
6-03-2009 @ 8:20AM
Crayfish said...
It was a good game, both teams played good. Glad the Pens won so we have more hockey to watch!
Reply
6-03-2009 @ 7:56AM
Nick said...
Once again, Dupuis snapped his stick on Hossa's skate. I was at Game 2, didn't NBC show this replay? If they did not, shame on them.
http://www.kuklaskorner.com/index.php/a2y/comments/more_fun_with_hockey_sticks/
Reply
6-03-2009 @ 8:30AM
Dlmc said...
So how about the Wings and their coach, guess they can't count either? Or did you expect the Pens to point out their own penalty? Maybe Crosby should have, OH no wait, he can't cause everytime he talks, he is accused of crying.
Reply
6-03-2009 @ 8:33AM
panther212918 said...
OH and here we have Jeff, another "NON" Wing fan whining....hahahahahahaha
Reply
6-03-2009 @ 12:23PM
Joe said...
@ Jeff
You must be a Pens fan cause according to "thetruth" Pens fans are the ONLY ones who whine.
Reply
6-03-2009 @ 9:17AM
jayandtiti said...
not that you're not at home and the calls didn't go your way you cry. i'll get the binky's. the too many men on the ice was a terrible no call though that was plain ole bad and the shot to the head should have been called but detroit got away with a few of those at home too. i am a pens fan but i will say the wing cannot be denied they are the best hockey team of the past 12 years. the pens got alot of work ahead of them, if they want to make it a series, im not sold on the pens yet because of fleury, im so sick of watching him flop around like a fish everytime a shot comes at him instead of mechanics of staying square with the puck in front of him. just floppin. it's hockey a fast paced game but yes ther were some in your face no calls but i don't think it's the ref's pulling for anyone, like i said the wings got away with a few while at home like each team will, but there was no excuse for the 2. the wings are the kings of falling down to get a penalty, and interference
Reply
6-03-2009 @ 10:04AM
shummey327 said...
Look when the Redwings won you guys were telling us to quit whinning. Look at what happens when we win. So stop whinning. You guys sing a different tune when we win. Just shut up
Reply